Learn how Kap and OBS Studio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.6.0License
MITRepository
wulkano/kap
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
33.0.1License
GPL-2.0Repository
obs-studio
OBS Studio appears to have several advantages over Kap, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OBS Studio significantly outpaces Kap in community adoption with 79,148 stars compared to 19,416 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests OBS Studio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OBS Studio has 11,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OBS Studio is growing faster, adding 1,948 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 27 stars for Kap (+0.1%). OBS Studio is both larger and pulling further ahead.
OBS Studio shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Kap was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests OBS Studio is being more actively maintained.
Kap uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while OBS Studio leverages CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, MATLAB, Lua.
OBS Studio has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kap which began 10 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests OBS Studio may have more mature features and established processes.
Kap uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OBS Studio's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.