Learn how OBS Studio and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both OBS Studio and ShareX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OBS Studio leads in popularity with 71,718 stars vs 36,183 stars for ShareX. The 98% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OBS Studio has 9,159 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OBS Studio last updated 5 hours ago and ShareX 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OBS Studio uses Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Swift, MATLAB, Lua while ShareX leverages C#.
Both projects started around the same time, with OBS Studio beginning 13 years ago and ShareX 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: OBS Studio is licensed under GPL-2.0 while ShareX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.