Learn how OBS Studio and ShareX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OBS Studio appears to have several advantages over ShareX, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OBS Studio leads in popularity with 75,212 stars vs 39,200 stars for ShareX. The 92% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OBS Studio has 9,791 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OBS Studio is growing faster, adding 1,221 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 476 stars for ShareX (+1.2%). OBS Studio is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OBS Studio last updated 5 days ago and ShareX 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OBS Studio uses Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, MATLAB, Lua while ShareX leverages C#.
Both projects started around the same time, with OBS Studio beginning 13 years ago and ShareX 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: OBS Studio is licensed under GPL-2.0 while ShareX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: ShareX extends into Screenshot Utilities.