Learn how Kap and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.6.0License
MITRepository
wulkano/kap
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v2.1.2License
MITRepository
openscreen
Both Kap and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kap significantly outpaces OpenScreen in community adoption with 19,406 stars compared to 4,890 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Kap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kap has 904 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenScreen is growing faster, adding 1,666 stars in the last 30 days (+52%) against adding 30 stars for Kap (+0.2%). OpenScreen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
OpenScreen shows more recent development activity with its last commit 18 hours ago, while Kap was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests OpenScreen is being more actively maintained.
Kap has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to OpenScreen which began 8 months ago. This 9.7-year head start suggests Kap may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.