Learn how OpenScreen and Screenity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v2.1.2License
MITRepository
openscreen
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.7.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
alyssaxuu/screenity
Both OpenScreen and Screenity have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Screenity significantly outpaces OpenScreen in community adoption with 18,806 stars compared to 4,890 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Screenity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Screenity has 1,532 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenScreen is growing faster, adding 1,666 stars in the last 30 days (+52%) against adding 78 stars for Screenity (+0.4%). OpenScreen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenScreen last updated 19 hours ago and Screenity 3 days ago.
Screenity has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to OpenScreen which began 8 months ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Screenity may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenScreen uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Screenity's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording. However, they also have distinct specializations: Screenity extends into Browser Extensions.