Learn how OBS Studio and OpenScreen differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these screen recording tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
33.0.0License
GPL-2.0Repository
obs-studio
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v2.1.2License
MITRepository
openscreen
Both OBS Studio and OpenScreen have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OBS Studio significantly outpaces OpenScreen in community adoption with 78,172 stars compared to 4,890 stars on GitHub. This 16.0x difference suggests OBS Studio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OBS Studio has 10,842 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenScreen is growing faster, adding 1,666 stars in the last 30 days (+52%) against adding 1,547 stars for OBS Studio (+2%). OpenScreen is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OBS Studio last updated 2 days ago and OpenScreen 18 hours ago.
OBS Studio has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to OpenScreen which began 8 months ago. This 12.6-year head start suggests OBS Studio may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenScreen uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OBS Studio's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Screen Recording.