Uptime Kuma vs Wachd
Learn how Uptime Kuma and Wachd differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Learn how Uptime Kuma and Wachd differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Uptime Kuma
Auto-fetched .
Wachd
Stars
29Forks
4Last commit
23 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsSelf-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over Wachd, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Uptime Kuma appears to have several advantages over Wachd, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Uptime Kuma significantly outpaces Wachd in community adoption with 87,784 stars compared to 29 stars on GitHub. This 3027.0x difference suggests Uptime Kuma has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Uptime Kuma has 7,970 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Uptime Kuma last updated 6 hours ago and Wachd 23 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Uptime Kuma uses SCSS, Vue, PHP, Java, C# while Wachd leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
Project Maturity
Uptime Kuma has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Wachd which began 2 months ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Uptime Kuma may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, while Wachd's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: Uptime Kuma also focuses on Status Pages, Uptime Monitoring.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Uptime Kuma and Wachd offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.