Ad
 
Learn more

Trigger vs Windmill

Learn how Trigger and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Trigger

Trigger

A developer-friendly platform for building, scheduling, and managing background jobs in your applications with minimal setup.
  • Stars


    14,740
  • Forks


    1,191
  • Last commit


    19 hours ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    Apache-2.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Trigger
Favicon of Windmill

Windmill

Powerful, self-hosted platform for building and running workflows, scripts, and apps with code-first approach and collaborative features.
  • Stars


    16,381
  • Forks


    941
  • Last commit


    16 hours ago
  • Repository age


    4 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Windmill

Detailed Comparison

Both Trigger and Windmill have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Trigger having 14,740 stars and Windmill having 16,381 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Trigger has 1,191 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Trigger last updated 19 hours ago and Windmill 16 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Trigger uses JSX, Next.js, Remix while Windmill leverages Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Trigger beginning 3 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.

Trigger wins
Licensing

Trigger is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Windmill's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Trigger also focuses on Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), Job Scheduling while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Automation.

Windmill wins
Hosting & Deployment

Windmill provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Trigger may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.