Learn how Automatisch and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.

Windmill appears to have several advantages over Automatisch, particularly in growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Automatisch having 13,932 stars and Windmill having 17,550 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Windmill has 1,068 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Windmill is growing faster, adding 377 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 44 stars for Automatisch (+0.3%). Windmill is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Windmill shows more recent development activity with its last commit 9 hours ago, while Automatisch was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Windmill is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Automatisch uses JSX, Vue while Windmill leverages Typescript, Python, Golang, C, Rust, Objective-C, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with Automatisch beginning 5 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation, Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automatisch also focuses on API Integration while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Automatisch and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository