n8n significantly outpaces Windmill in community adoption with 200,740 stars compared to 17,550 stars on GitHub. This 11.4x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 60,147 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

n8n and Windmill are moving at much the same rate, adding 4,046 stars and adding 377 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.1% vs +2.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Both projects show recent activity, with n8n last updated 17 hours ago and Windmill 9 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n uses SCSS, Vue while Windmill leverages Python, Golang, C, Rust, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Windmill which began 4 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation, Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: n8n also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.

Both n8n and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.