Learn how n8n and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both n8n and Windmill have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces Windmill in community adoption with 205,908 stars compared to 18,030 stars on GitHub. This 11.4x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 60,881 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Windmill is growing faster, adding 343 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 3,397 stars for n8n (+1.7%). Windmill is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with n8n last updated 11 hours ago and Windmill 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n uses SCSS, Vue while Windmill leverages Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.
n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Windmill which began 4 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: n8n also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both n8n and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.