n8n significantly outpaces Automa in community adoption with 198,099 stars compared to 21,520 stars on GitHub. This 9.2x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 59,645 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

n8n shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Automa was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests n8n is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS.

n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Automa which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automa also focuses on Browser Automation while n8n extends into Workflow Orchestration.

n8n provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Automa may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.