What is the main difference between Automa and n8n?

Automa and n8n are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Automa or n8n?

The choice between Automa and n8n depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Automa to n8n?

Migration between Automa and n8n is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Automa vs n8n

Learn how Automa and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Automa

Automa is a browser extension for automating repetitive tasks, form filling, screenshots, and web scraping using a visual block-based interface.

Visit Automa Read more

Stars
21,327
Forks
2,323
Last commit
3 months ago
Repository age
5 years

View Repository

Auto-fetched 17 minutes ago.

n8n

Build automated workflows connecting 500+ apps, write custom code, and deploy AI agents with full visibility into every decision. Self-hostable or cloud.

Visit n8n Read more

Stars
189,268
Forks
57,911
Last commit
23 minutes ago
Repository age
7 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 17 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

n8n appears to have several advantages over Automa, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

n8n wins

Community & Popularity

n8n significantly outpaces Automa in community adoption with 189,268 stars compared to 21,327 stars on GitHub. This 8.9x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 57,911 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

n8n wins

Development Activity

n8n shows more recent development activity with its last commit 23 minutes ago, while Automa was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests n8n is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS.

n8n wins

Project Maturity

n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Automa which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automa also focuses on Browser Automation while n8n extends into Workflow Orchestration.

n8n wins

Hosting & Deployment

n8n provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Automa may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider