Learn how Automa and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

n8n appears to have several advantages over Automa, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces Automa in community adoption with 186,304 stars compared to 21,260 stars on GitHub. This 8.8x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 57,269 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
n8n shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Automa was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests n8n is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS.
n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Automa which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automa also focuses on Browser Automation while n8n extends into Workflow Orchestration.
n8n provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Automa may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.