Ad
 
Learn more

Automa vs n8n

Learn how Automa and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Automa

Automa

Automa is a browser extension for automating repetitive tasks, form filling, screenshots, and web scraping using a visual block-based interface.
  • Stars


    21,260
  • Forks


    2,308
  • Last commit


    2 months ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Automa
Favicon of n8n

n8n

A flexible automation platform combining AI capabilities with business process automation, offering both code-based and no-code options for technical teams.
  • Stars


    186,304
  • Forks


    57,269
  • Last commit


    13 hours ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of n8n

Detailed Comparison

n8n appears to have several advantages over Automa, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

n8n wins
Community & Popularity

n8n significantly outpaces Automa in community adoption with 186,304 stars compared to 21,260 stars on GitHub. This 8.8x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 57,269 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

n8n wins
Development Activity

n8n shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Automa was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests n8n is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n leverages Bash, Typescript, SCSS.

n8n wins
Project Maturity

n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Automa which began 5 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automa also focuses on Browser Automation while n8n extends into Workflow Orchestration.

n8n wins
Hosting & Deployment

n8n provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Automa may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.