Ad
Learn more

ActivePieces vs n8n

Learn how ActivePieces and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

vs

ActivePieces

Open-source integration platform for seamless workflow automation. Connect apps, automate tasks, and boost productivity effortlessly.
25,295stars+479(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    6 hours ago
  • Repository age

    4 years
  • Version

    0.92.3
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    activepieces
Screenshot of ActivePieces

n8n

Build automated workflows connecting 500+ apps, write custom code, and deploy AI agents with full visibility into every decision. Self-hostable or cloud.
209,142stars+2,767(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    6 hours ago
  • Repository age

    7 years
  • Version

    2.45.7
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    n8n-io/n8n
Screenshot of n8n

Detailed Comparison

Both ActivePieces and n8n have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

n8n wins
Community & Popularity

n8n significantly outpaces ActivePieces in community adoption with 209,142 stars compared to 25,295 stars on GitHub. This 8.3x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 61,320 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

ActivePieces wins
Growth Momentum

ActivePieces is growing faster, adding 479 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 2,767 stars for n8n (+1.3%). ActivePieces is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 6 hours ago and n8n 6 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while n8n leverages SCSS, Vue.

n8n wins
Project Maturity

n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to ActivePieces which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.

ActivePieces wins
Licensing

ActivePieces is licensed under MIT, while n8n's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on API Integration.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both ActivePieces and n8n offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.