Learn how ActivePieces and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ActivePieces and n8n have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces ActivePieces in community adoption with 202,870 stars compared to 24,121 stars on GitHub. This 8.4x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 60,463 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ActivePieces is growing faster, adding 596 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 4,014 stars for n8n (+2%). ActivePieces is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 5 hours ago and n8n 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while n8n leverages SCSS, Vue.
n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to ActivePieces which began 4 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.
ActivePieces is licensed under MIT, while n8n's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on API Integration.
Both ActivePieces and n8n offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.