Learn how ActivePieces and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

ActivePieces appears to have several advantages over Windmill, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ActivePieces having 24,266 stars and Windmill having 17,781 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ActivePieces has 4,140 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ActivePieces is growing faster, adding 656 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 319 stars for Windmill (+1.8%). ActivePieces is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 13 hours ago and Windmill 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while Windmill leverages Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with ActivePieces beginning 4 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.
ActivePieces is licensed under MIT, while Windmill's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, API Integration while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both ActivePieces and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.