Ad
Learn more

ActivePieces vs Windmill

Learn how ActivePieces and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.

vs

ActivePieces

Open-source integration platform for seamless workflow automation. Connect apps, automate tasks, and boost productivity effortlessly.
25,369stars+459(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    7 hours ago
  • Repository age

    4 years
  • Version

    0.92.3
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    activepieces
Screenshot of ActivePieces

Windmill

Powerful, self-hosted platform for building and running workflows, scripts, and apps with code-first approach and collaborative features.
18,372stars+265(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    7 hours ago
  • Repository age

    5 years
  • Version

    v1.861.0
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    windmill
Screenshot of Windmill

Detailed Comparison

ActivePieces appears to have several advantages over Windmill, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ActivePieces having 25,369 stars and Windmill having 18,372 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ActivePieces has 4,427 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

ActivePieces wins
Growth Momentum

ActivePieces is growing faster, adding 459 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 265 stars for Windmill (+1.5%). ActivePieces is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 7 hours ago and Windmill 7 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while Windmill leverages Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with ActivePieces beginning 4 years ago and Windmill 5 years ago.

ActivePieces wins
Licensing

ActivePieces is licensed under MIT, while Windmill's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, API Integration while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both ActivePieces and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.