Learn how ActivePieces and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both ActivePieces and Windmill have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ActivePieces having 22,001 stars and Windmill having 16,381 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ActivePieces has 3,610 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 19 hours ago and Windmill 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while Windmill leverages Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with ActivePieces beginning 3 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, API Integration while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Orchestration.
Both ActivePieces and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.