Hatchet vs Trigger
Learn how Hatchet and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Hatchet and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Hatchet
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.105.16License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hatchet-dev/hatchet
Trigger
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.5.16License
Apache-2.0Repository
triggerdotdev/trigger.dev
Detailed Comparison
Both Hatchet and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hatchet and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Trigger leads in popularity with 16,215 stars vs 7,874 stars for Hatchet. The 106% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Trigger has 1,436 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Hatchet is growing faster, adding 198 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 288 stars for Trigger (+1.8%). Hatchet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Hatchet last updated 1 day ago and Trigger 24 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hatchet uses Golang while Trigger leverages Remix.
Project Maturity
Trigger has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Hatchet which began 3 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Trigger may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hatchet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Trigger's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Hatchet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Trigger may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.