Hatchet vs Trigger
Learn how Hatchet and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Learn how Hatchet and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these durable execution tools is best for you.
Hatchet
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.114.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
hatchet-dev/hatchet
Trigger
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.8.3License
Apache-2.0Repository
trigger.dev
Detailed Comparison
Both Hatchet and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hatchet and Trigger have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Trigger leads in popularity with 16,716 stars vs 8,225 stars for Hatchet. The 103% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Trigger has 1,525 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Hatchet is growing faster, adding 153 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 229 stars for Trigger (+1.4%). Hatchet is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Hatchet last updated 14 hours ago and Trigger 2 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hatchet uses Golang while Trigger leverages Remix.
Project Maturity
Trigger has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Hatchet which began 3 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Trigger may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Hatchet uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Trigger's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Durable Execution.
Hosting & Deployment
Hatchet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Trigger may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool