n8n vs Trigger
Learn how n8n and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.
Learn how n8n and Trigger differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.
n8n
Stars
186,304Forks
57,269Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsSelf-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Trigger
Stars
14,740Forks
1,191Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
n8n appears to have several advantages over Trigger, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
n8n appears to have several advantages over Trigger, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
n8n significantly outpaces Trigger in community adoption with 186,304 stars compared to 14,740 stars on GitHub. This 12.6x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 57,269 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with n8n last updated 13 hours ago and Trigger 19 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n uses SCSS, Vue while Trigger leverages JSX, Python, Next.js, Remix.
Project Maturity
n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Trigger which began 3 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Trigger is licensed under Apache-2.0, while n8n's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: n8n also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation while Trigger extends into Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), Job Scheduling.
Hosting & Deployment
n8n provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Trigger may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.