Learn how Kestra and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 minutes agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v2.0.9License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kestra-io/kestra
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 minutes agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
2.46.6Self-hosted
YesRepository
n8n-io/n8n
Both Kestra and n8n have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces Kestra in community adoption with 209,589 stars compared to 30,148 stars on GitHub. This 7.0x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 61,366 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kestra is growing faster, adding 838 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 2,824 stars for n8n (+1.4%). Kestra is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kestra last updated 15 minutes ago and n8n 15 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kestra uses JSX, Python, Java while n8n leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kestra beginning 7 years ago and n8n 7 years ago.
Kestra is licensed under Apache-2.0, while n8n's license terms are not publicly specified.
Kestra also focuses on ETL & Data Integration, Workflow Orchestration while n8n extends into Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation.
Both Kestra and n8n offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.