Kestra vs Mage
Learn how Kestra and Mage differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these etl & data integration tools is best for you.
Learn how Kestra and Mage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these etl & data integration tools is best for you.
Kestra
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v1.3.30License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kestra-io/kestra
Mage
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
0.9.79License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
mage-ai/mage-ai
Detailed Comparison
Kestra appears to have several advantages over Mage, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kestra appears to have several advantages over Mage, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Kestra significantly outpaces Mage in community adoption with 27,928 stars compared to 8,814 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Kestra has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kestra has 2,943 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Kestra is growing faster, adding 445 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 35 stars for Mage (+0.4%). Kestra is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Kestra last updated 11 hours ago and Mage 13 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kestra uses Vue, Java while Mage leverages CSS, Next.js, R.
Project Maturity
Kestra has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Mage which began 4 years ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests Kestra may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in ETL & Data Integration, Workflow Orchestration.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Kestra and Mage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.