Learn how Hatchet and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Hatchet and Windmill have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Windmill leads in popularity with 16,254 stars vs 6,854 stars for Hatchet. The 137% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Windmill has 925 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hatchet last updated 10 hours ago and Windmill 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hatchet uses JSX, Next.js while Windmill leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.
Windmill has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Hatchet which began 2 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Windmill may have more mature features and established processes.
Hatchet is licensed under MIT, while Windmill's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hatchet also focuses on Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS), CI/CD Platforms, Job Scheduling while Windmill extends into Workflow Orchestration.
Both Hatchet and Windmill offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.