Learn how Stormkit and Temps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Temps appears to have several advantages over Stormkit, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Temps significantly outpaces Stormkit in community adoption with 806 stars compared to 262 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Temps has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Temps has 66 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Temps is growing faster, adding 106 stars in the last 30 days (+15%) against adding 7 stars for Stormkit (+2.7%). Temps is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Stormkit last updated 22 hours ago and Temps 21 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Temps leverages Bash, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, C#, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Stormkit beginning 11 months ago and Temps 11 months ago.
The projects use different licenses: Stormkit is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Temps uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stormkit also focuses on CI/CD Platforms while Temps extends into Control Panels, Error Tracking.
Both Stormkit and Temps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.