Learn how Stormkit and Temps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Temps appears to have several advantages over Stormkit, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Temps leads in popularity with 654 stars vs 253 stars for Stormkit. The 158% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Temps has 46 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Temps is growing faster, adding 112 stars in the last 30 days (+21%) against adding 27 stars for Stormkit (+12%). Temps is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Stormkit last updated 12 hours ago and Temps 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Temps leverages Bash, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, C#, NestJS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Stormkit beginning 10 months ago and Temps 10 months ago.
The projects use different licenses: Stormkit is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Temps uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Stormkit also focuses on CI/CD Platforms, Build & Deployment while Temps extends into Control Panels, Error Tracking.
Both Stormkit and Temps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.