Learn how Coolify and Temps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Coolify appears to have several advantages over Temps, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Coolify significantly outpaces Temps in community adoption with 54,832 stars compared to 435 stars on GitHub. This 126.1x difference suggests Coolify has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Coolify has 4,347 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Coolify last updated 3 days ago and Temps 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Coolify uses PHP, Laravel while Temps leverages Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, C#, NestJS.
Coolify has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Temps which began 7 months ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Coolify may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools, Control Panels. However, they also have distinct specializations: Coolify also focuses on Cloud Infrastructure Management while Temps extends into Error Tracking.
Both Coolify and Temps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.