Learn how Temps and ZaneOps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.0.8License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
gotempsh/temps
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.15.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
zane-ops/zane-ops
ZaneOps appears to have several advantages over Temps, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ZaneOps leads in popularity with 1,387 stars vs 869 stars for Temps. The 60% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, ZaneOps has 74 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Temps is growing faster, adding 74 stars in the last 30 days (+9.3%) against adding 5 stars for ZaneOps (+0.4%). Temps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Temps last updated 6 hours ago and ZaneOps 16 hours ago.
ZaneOps has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Temps which began 1 year ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests ZaneOps may have more mature features and established processes.
ZaneOps uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Temps's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Temps also focuses on Control Panels, Error Tracking.
Both Temps and ZaneOps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.