Learn how Coolify and ZaneOps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.5.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
coollabsio/coolify
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.15.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
zane-ops/zane-ops
Coolify appears to have several advantages over ZaneOps, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Coolify significantly outpaces ZaneOps in community adoption with 64,720 stars compared to 1,387 stars on GitHub. This 46.7x difference suggests Coolify has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Coolify has 5,813 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Coolify is growing faster, adding 2,433 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 5 stars for ZaneOps (+0.4%). Coolify is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Coolify last updated 6 hours ago and ZaneOps 16 hours ago.
Coolify has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to ZaneOps which began 3 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Coolify may have more mature features and established processes.
ZaneOps uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Coolify's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Coolify also focuses on Control Panels, Cloud Infrastructure Management.
Both Coolify and ZaneOps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.