Learn how /dev/push and ZaneOps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 months agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.4.6License
MITRepository
hunvreus/devpush
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.15.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
zane-ops/zane-ops
Both /dev/push and ZaneOps have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
/dev/push significantly outpaces ZaneOps in community adoption with 4,780 stars compared to 1,387 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests /dev/push has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, /dev/push has 185 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
/dev/push and ZaneOps are moving at much the same rate, adding 24 stars and adding 5 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
ZaneOps shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while /dev/push was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests ZaneOps is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with /dev/push beginning 2 years ago and ZaneOps 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: /dev/push also focuses on CI/CD Platforms.
ZaneOps provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.