Learn how /dev/push and Dokku differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Dokku appears to have several advantages over /dev/push, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokku significantly outpaces /dev/push in community adoption with 32,107 stars compared to 4,744 stars on GitHub. This 6.8x difference suggests Dokku has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokku has 2,070 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
/dev/push and Dokku are moving at much the same rate, adding 17 stars and adding 58 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Dokku shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while /dev/push was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Dokku is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: /dev/push uses JavaScript while Dokku leverages Golang.
Dokku has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to /dev/push which began 2 years ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests Dokku may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: /dev/push also focuses on CI/CD Platforms.
Dokku provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.