Learn how /dev/push and Stormkit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.0License
MITRepository
hunvreus/devpush
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v2026.11.07.1License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
stormkit-io
/dev/push appears to have several advantages over Stormkit, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
/dev/push significantly outpaces Stormkit in community adoption with 4,827 stars compared to 267 stars on GitHub. This 18.1x difference suggests /dev/push has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, /dev/push has 190 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
/dev/push is growing faster, adding 60 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 1 stars for Stormkit (+0.4%). /dev/push is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with /dev/push last updated 7 days ago and Stormkit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: /dev/push uses Bash, Python while Stormkit leverages Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with /dev/push beginning 2 years ago and Stormkit 1 year ago.
/dev/push uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Stormkit's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools, CI/CD Platforms.
Stormkit provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.