Learn how Dokploy and Stormkit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Dokploy and Stormkit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces Stormkit in community adoption with 33,523 stars compared to 222 stars on GitHub. This 151.0x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,407 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dokploy last updated 2 days ago and Stormkit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dokploy uses Bash, Next.js, Golang.
Dokploy has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Stormkit which began 6 months ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Dokploy may have more mature features and established processes.
Stormkit is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dokploy also focuses on Control Panels while Stormkit extends into CI/CD Platforms, Build & Deployment.
Both Dokploy and Stormkit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.