Learn how Dokploy and Stormkit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.

Both Dokploy and Stormkit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces Stormkit in community adoption with 36,535 stars compared to 245 stars on GitHub. This 149.1x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,848 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Stormkit is growing faster, adding 20 stars in the last 30 days (+8.9%) against adding 916 stars for Dokploy (+2.6%). Stormkit is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dokploy last updated 7 hours ago and Stormkit 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dokploy uses Bash, Next.js, Golang.
Dokploy has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Stormkit which began 9 months ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Dokploy may have more mature features and established processes.
Stormkit is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dokploy also focuses on Control Panels while Stormkit extends into CI/CD Platforms, Build & Deployment.
Both Dokploy and Stormkit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository