Learn how Coolify and Stormkit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Coolify appears to have several advantages over Stormkit, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Coolify significantly outpaces Stormkit in community adoption with 53,667 stars compared to 221 stars on GitHub. This 242.8x difference suggests Coolify has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Coolify has 4,159 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Coolify last updated 15 hours ago and Stormkit 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Coolify uses Bash, PHP, Laravel while Stormkit leverages Typescript, JSX.
Coolify has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Stormkit which began 6 months ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Coolify may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Coolify is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Stormkit uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Coolify also focuses on Control Panels, Cloud Infrastructure Management while Stormkit extends into CI/CD Platforms, Build & Deployment.
Both Coolify and Stormkit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.