Learn how Dokploy and ZaneOps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.31.2Self-hosted
YesRepository
dokploy/dokploy
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.15.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
zane-ops/zane-ops
Both Dokploy and ZaneOps have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces ZaneOps in community adoption with 38,531 stars compared to 1,395 stars on GitHub. This 27.6x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 3,178 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy is growing faster, adding 711 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 7 stars for ZaneOps (+0.5%). Dokploy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dokploy last updated 2 days ago and ZaneOps 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dokploy uses JavaScript, Next.js, Golang while ZaneOps leverages Python, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Dokploy beginning 3 years ago and ZaneOps 3 years ago.
ZaneOps is licensed under MIT, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dokploy also focuses on Control Panels.
Both Dokploy and ZaneOps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.