Learn how Dokploy and Dyrector differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Dokploy and Dyrector have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces Dyrector in community adoption with 36,718 stars compared to 1,847 stars on GitHub. This 19.9x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,881 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy is growing faster, adding 845 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 2 stars for Dyrector (+0.1%). Dokploy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dokploy last updated 1 day ago and Dyrector 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dyrector leverages NestJS.
Dyrector has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Dokploy which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Dyrector may have more mature features and established processes.
Dyrector is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dokploy also focuses on Control Panels while Dyrector extends into Container Orchestration.
Dokploy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dyrector may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.