Learn how Dokploy and Dyrector differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Dokploy and Dyrector have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces Dyrector in community adoption with 37,169 stars compared to 1,845 stars on GitHub. This 20.1x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,960 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy is growing faster, adding 707 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against losing 1 stars for Dyrector (-0.1%). Dokploy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dokploy last updated 13 hours ago and Dyrector 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dyrector leverages NestJS.
Dyrector has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Dokploy which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Dyrector may have more mature features and established processes.
Dyrector is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dokploy also focuses on Control Panels while Dyrector extends into Container Orchestration.
Dokploy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dyrector may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.