Learn how /dev/push and Dokploy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.0.3License
MITRepository
hunvreus/devpush
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.30.10Self-hosted
YesRepository
dokploy/dokploy
Dokploy appears to have several advantages over /dev/push, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces /dev/push in community adoption with 38,167 stars compared to 4,780 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 3,133 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy is growing faster, adding 539 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 22 stars for /dev/push (+0.5%). Dokploy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with /dev/push last updated 3 days ago and Dokploy 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: /dev/push uses Python while Dokploy leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with /dev/push beginning 2 years ago and Dokploy 3 years ago.
/dev/push is licensed under MIT, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: /dev/push also focuses on CI/CD Platforms while Dokploy extends into Control Panels.
Dokploy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.