Learn how /dev/push and Dokploy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Dokploy appears to have several advantages over /dev/push, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces /dev/push in community adoption with 35,996 stars compared to 4,726 stars on GitHub. This 7.6x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,781 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while /dev/push was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Dokploy is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: /dev/push uses Python while Dokploy leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with /dev/push beginning 2 years ago and Dokploy 2 years ago.
/dev/push is licensed under MIT, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: /dev/push also focuses on CI/CD Platforms while Dokploy extends into Control Panels.
Dokploy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.