Learn how /dev/push and Dokploy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Dokploy appears to have several advantages over /dev/push, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dokploy significantly outpaces /dev/push in community adoption with 33,523 stars compared to 4,636 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Dokploy has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dokploy has 2,407 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dokploy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while /dev/push was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Dokploy is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: /dev/push uses Python while Dokploy leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with /dev/push beginning 1 year ago and Dokploy 2 years ago.
/dev/push is licensed under MIT, while Dokploy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: /dev/push also focuses on CI/CD Platforms while Dokploy extends into Control Panels.
Dokploy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while /dev/push may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.