Ad
 
Learn more

Plunk vs Sendportal

Learn how Plunk and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Plunk

Plunk

Plunk unifies marketing, transactional, and broadcast emails into a single, complete solution for businesses of all sizes.
  • Stars


    4,976
  • Forks


    328
  • Last commit


    1 day ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Plunk
Favicon of Sendportal

Sendportal

Open-source email marketing platform offering unlimited subscribers, campaigns, and workspaces. Self-hosted solution with powerful API and beautiful interface.
  • Stars


    2,119
  • Forks


    455
  • Last commit


    2 years ago
  • Repository age


    6 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 2 years and might not be actively maintained anymore.

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Sendportal

Detailed Comparison

Both Plunk and Sendportal have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Plunk wins
Community & Popularity

Plunk leads in popularity with 4,976 stars vs 2,119 stars for Sendportal. The 135% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 455 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Plunk wins
Development Activity

Plunk shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Sendportal was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Plunk is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Plunk uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.

Sendportal wins
Project Maturity

Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Plunk which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.

Sendportal wins
Licensing

Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plunk's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plunk also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms.

Sendportal wins
Hosting & Deployment

Sendportal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plunk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.