Learn how Plunk and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Plunk and Sendportal have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plunk leads in popularity with 5,376 stars vs 2,159 stars for Sendportal. The 149% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 463 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Plunk is growing faster, adding 97 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 8 stars for Sendportal (+0.4%). Plunk is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Plunk shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Sendportal was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Plunk is being more actively maintained.
Plunk uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.
Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Plunk which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plunk's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plunk also focuses on Customer Communication Platforms.
Sendportal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plunk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.