Learn how MailCheap and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Sendportal appears to have several advantages over MailCheap, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sendportal leads in popularity with 2,175 stars vs 1,240 stars for MailCheap. The 75% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 469 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
MailCheap and Sendportal are moving at much the same rate, adding 0 stars and adding 2 stars respectively over the last 30 days (0% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with MailCheap last updated 5 hours ago and Sendportal 7 days ago.
Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to MailCheap which began 9 days ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than MailCheap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Both MailCheap and Sendportal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.