Learn how MailCheap and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
29 daysLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
marclou/mailcheap
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.0.0.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mettle/sendportal
Both MailCheap and Sendportal have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with MailCheap having 1,660 stars and Sendportal having 2,190 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 475 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
MailCheap is growing faster, adding 410 stars in the last 30 days (+33%) against adding 15 stars for Sendportal (+0.7%). MailCheap is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with MailCheap last updated 2 days ago and Sendportal 17 days ago.
MailCheap uses JavaScript, CSS, JSX, Next.js while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.
Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to MailCheap which began 29 days ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than MailCheap's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Both MailCheap and Sendportal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.