Learn how Keila and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
0.40.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
pentacent/keila
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.0.0.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mettle/sendportal
Both Keila and Sendportal have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Keila and Sendportal show comparable community engagement with 2,261 and 2,190 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 475 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Keila is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 15 stars for Sendportal (+0.7%). Keila is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 4 days ago and Sendportal 17 days ago.
Keila uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS, Elixir while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Keila beginning 6 years ago and Sendportal 6 years ago.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Keila's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and Sendportal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.