Learn how Keila and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Keila and Sendportal have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Keila and Sendportal show comparable community engagement with 2,237 and 2,175 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 469 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Keila is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 2 stars for Sendportal (+0.1%). Keila is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 17 days ago and Sendportal 7 days ago.
Keila uses JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS, Elixir while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Keila beginning 6 years ago and Sendportal 6 years ago.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Keila's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and Sendportal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.