Learn how Keila and Listmonk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Listmonk appears to have several advantages over Keila, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Listmonk significantly outpaces Keila in community adoption with 19,551 stars compared to 2,070 stars on GitHub. This 9.4x difference suggests Listmonk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Listmonk has 1,998 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 2 days ago and Listmonk 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses Elixir while Listmonk leverages Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, Vue.
Listmonk has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Keila which began 5 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Listmonk may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Marketing Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Email Platforms.
Both Keila and Listmonk offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.