Learn how Keila and Listmonk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
0.40.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
pentacent/keila
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v7.0.0-beta.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
knadh/listmonk
Listmonk appears to have several advantages over Keila, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Listmonk significantly outpaces Keila in community adoption with 24,194 stars compared to 2,261 stars on GitHub. This 10.7x difference suggests Listmonk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Listmonk has 2,762 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Listmonk is growing faster, adding 469 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 31 stars for Keila (+1.4%). Listmonk is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 4 days ago and Listmonk 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses Elixir while Listmonk leverages Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, Vue.
Listmonk has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Keila which began 6 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Listmonk may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and Listmonk offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.