Learn how Keila and Mautic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these marketing automation tools is best for you.

Mautic appears to have several advantages over Keila, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mautic significantly outpaces Keila in community adoption with 10,348 stars compared to 2,187 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Mautic has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mautic has 3,403 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mautic is growing faster, adding 199 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 25 stars for Keila (+1.2%). Mautic is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 15 days ago and Mautic 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses SCSS, Elixir while Mautic leverages Typescript, PHP.
Mautic has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Keila which began 6 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests Mautic may have more mature features and established processes.
Keila is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mautic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Marketing Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Email Marketing & Newsletters, Email Platforms.
Both Keila and Mautic offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository