Learn how Keila and Mautic differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these marketing automation tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Keila and Mautic have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mautic significantly outpaces Keila in community adoption with 10,575 stars compared to 2,223 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Mautic has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mautic has 3,468 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Keila and Mautic are moving at much the same rate, adding 29 stars and adding 160 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 8 days ago and Mautic 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses SCSS, Elixir while Mautic leverages Typescript, PHP.
Mautic has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Keila which began 6 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests Mautic may have more mature features and established processes.
Keila is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Mautic's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Marketing Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Email Marketing & Newsletters, Email Platforms.
Both Keila and Mautic offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.