Learn how Keila and Notifuse differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
0.40.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
pentacent/keila
Last 30 days
Last commit
22 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v42.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
notifuse/notifuse
Both Keila and Notifuse have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Keila and Notifuse show comparable community engagement with 2,261 and 2,274 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Notifuse has 243 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Keila and Notifuse are moving at much the same rate, adding 31 stars and adding 34 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 4 days ago and Notifuse 22 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses SCSS, Elixir while Notifuse leverages Typescript, JSX, Golang.
Keila has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Notifuse which began 2 years ago. This 4.3-year head start suggests Keila may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and Notifuse offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.