Learn how Keila and MailCheap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
0.40.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
pentacent/keila
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
29 daysLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
marclou/mailcheap
Both Keila and MailCheap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Keila having 2,261 stars and MailCheap having 1,660 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, MailCheap has 420 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
MailCheap is growing faster, adding 410 stars in the last 30 days (+33%) against adding 31 stars for Keila (+1.4%). MailCheap is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 4 days ago and MailCheap 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keila uses Bash, SCSS, Elixir while MailCheap leverages JSX, Next.js.
Keila has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to MailCheap which began 29 days ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Keila may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and MailCheap offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.