Learn how Keila and MailCheap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Keila appears to have several advantages over MailCheap, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keila leads in popularity with 2,237 stars vs 1,240 stars for MailCheap. The 80% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, MailCheap has 316 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Keila is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 0 stars for MailCheap (0%). Keila is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keila last updated 17 days ago and MailCheap 5 hours ago.
Keila has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to MailCheap which began 9 days ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Keila may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keila also focuses on Marketing Automation.
Both Keila and MailCheap offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.