Learn how MailCheap and Plunk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Plunk appears to have several advantages over MailCheap, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plunk significantly outpaces MailCheap in community adoption with 5,524 stars compared to 1,240 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Plunk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plunk has 420 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Plunk is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 0 stars for MailCheap (0%). Plunk is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with MailCheap last updated 5 hours ago and Plunk 1 day ago.
Plunk has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to MailCheap which began 9 days ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests Plunk may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plunk extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Email Platforms.
MailCheap provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plunk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.