Learn how Hyvor Relay and Plunk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
0.0.48License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
hyvor/relay
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.18.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
useplunk/plunk
Both Hyvor Relay and Plunk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plunk significantly outpaces Hyvor Relay in community adoption with 5,594 stars compared to 922 stars on GitHub. This 6.1x difference suggests Plunk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plunk has 435 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Plunk is growing faster, adding 86 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 6 stars for Hyvor Relay (+0.7%). Plunk is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 5 days ago and Plunk 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while Plunk leverages JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyvor Relay beginning 1 year ago and Plunk 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plunk extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Hyvor Relay provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plunk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.