Learn how Hyvor Relay and Plunk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Both Hyvor Relay and Plunk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plunk significantly outpaces Hyvor Relay in community adoption with 5,329 stars compared to 716 stars on GitHub. This 7.4x difference suggests Plunk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plunk has 387 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 3 days ago and Plunk 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while Plunk leverages JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyvor Relay beginning 1 year ago and Plunk 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plunk extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Hyvor Relay provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Plunk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Plunkvs
Billion MailActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
