Learn how Hyvor Relay and Postal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Postal appears to have several advantages over Hyvor Relay, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Postal significantly outpaces Hyvor Relay in community adoption with 16,460 stars compared to 566 stars on GitHub. This 29.1x difference suggests Postal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Postal has 1,229 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 8 days ago and Postal 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses CSS, Typescript, Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while Postal leverages SCSS, Ruby, CoffeeScript.
Postal has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Hyvor Relay which began 11 months ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Postal may have more mature features and established processes.
Postal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hyvor Relay's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Postal extends into Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Both Hyvor Relay and Postal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.