Learn how Postal and Sessy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
3.3.7License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
postalserver/postal
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
10 monthsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
marckohlbrugge/sessy
Postal appears to have several advantages over Sessy, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Postal significantly outpaces Sessy in community adoption with 16,906 stars compared to 944 stars on GitHub. This 17.9x difference suggests Postal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Postal has 1,318 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sessy is growing faster, adding 7 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 31 stars for Postal (+0.2%). Sessy is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Postal last updated 1 day ago and Sessy 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Postal uses Bash, SCSS, CoffeeScript while Sessy leverages CSS.
Postal has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sessy which began 10 months ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Postal may have more mature features and established processes.
Postal is licensed under MIT, while Sessy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms.
Both Postal and Sessy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.