Learn how Hyvor Relay and Sessy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Hyvor Relay appears to have several advantages over Sessy, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hyvor Relay and Sessy show comparable community engagement with 918 and 941 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Hyvor Relay has 66 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Hyvor Relay is growing faster, adding 18 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 11 stars for Sessy (+1.2%). Hyvor Relay is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 4 days ago and Sessy 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses Bash, Typescript, Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while Sessy leverages Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyvor Relay beginning 1 year ago and Sessy 10 months ago.
Hyvor Relay is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Sessy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms.
Both Hyvor Relay and Sessy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.