Learn how Hyvor Relay and Sessy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
0.0.48License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
hyvor/relay
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
10 monthsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
marckohlbrugge/sessy
Both Hyvor Relay and Sessy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hyvor Relay and Sessy show comparable community engagement with 922 and 945 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Hyvor Relay has 64 forks, indicating growing developer engagement.
Sessy is growing faster, adding 9 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 6 stars for Hyvor Relay (+0.7%). Sessy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 5 days ago and Sessy 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses Bash, Typescript, Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while Sessy leverages Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyvor Relay beginning 1 year ago and Sessy 10 months ago.
Hyvor Relay is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Sessy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms.
Both Hyvor Relay and Sessy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.