Learn how Hyvor Relay and useSend differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Hyvor Relay and useSend have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
useSend significantly outpaces Hyvor Relay in community adoption with 4,738 stars compared to 918 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests useSend has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, useSend has 440 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Hyvor Relay is growing faster, adding 18 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 49 stars for useSend (+1%). Hyvor Relay is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Relay last updated 4 days ago and useSend 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Relay uses Golang, PHP, SvelteKit while useSend leverages JSX, Next.js.
useSend has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Hyvor Relay which began 1 year ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests useSend may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: useSend extends into Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Both Hyvor Relay and useSend offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.