Learn how Hyvor Post and Listmonk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Listmonk appears to have several advantages over Hyvor Post, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Listmonk significantly outpaces Hyvor Post in community adoption with 19,551 stars compared to 27 stars on GitHub. This 724.1x difference suggests Listmonk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Listmonk has 1,998 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Post last updated 23 hours ago and Listmonk 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Post uses PHP, SvelteKit while Listmonk leverages Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Golang, Vue.
Listmonk has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hyvor Post which began 1 year ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests Listmonk may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hyvor Post also focuses on Content & Publishing while Listmonk extends into Marketing Automation.
Listmonk provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hyvor Post may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.