Learn how Hyvor Post and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.0.63License
AGPL-3.0Repository
hyvor/post
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.0.0.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
mettle/sendportal
Sendportal appears to have several advantages over Hyvor Post, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sendportal significantly outpaces Hyvor Post in community adoption with 2,190 stars compared to 34 stars on GitHub. This 64.4x difference suggests Sendportal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sendportal has 475 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Post last updated 13 days ago and Sendportal 17 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Post uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SvelteKit while Sendportal leverages Laravel.
Sendportal has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hyvor Post which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Sendportal may have more mature features and established processes.
Sendportal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hyvor Post's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Sendportal provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hyvor Post may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.