Learn how OpenMeter and Paymenter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.0.0-beta.236License
Apache-2.0Repository
openmeter
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.5.9License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
paymenter/paymenter
Paymenter appears to have several advantages over OpenMeter, particularly in growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OpenMeter having 2,440 stars and Paymenter having 2,831 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Paymenter has 572 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Paymenter is growing faster, adding 413 stars in the last 30 days (+17%) against adding 64 stars for OpenMeter (+2.7%). Paymenter is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenMeter last updated 1 day ago and Paymenter 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenMeter uses Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang while Paymenter leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenMeter beginning 3 years ago and Paymenter 4 years ago.
Paymenter uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenMeter's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenMeter also focuses on Cloud Cost & Optimization while Paymenter extends into Payment Infrastructure.
Paymenter provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenMeter may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.