Learn how Lago and Paymenter differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.55.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getlago/lago
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.5.9License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
paymenter/paymenter
Both Lago and Paymenter have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Lago significantly outpaces Paymenter in community adoption with 10,728 stars compared to 2,813 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Lago has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Lago has 779 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Paymenter is growing faster, adding 414 stars in the last 30 days (+17%) against adding 83 stars for Lago (+0.8%). Paymenter is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Lago last updated 13 hours ago and Paymenter 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lago uses Golang while Paymenter leverages JavaScript, CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Both projects started around the same time, with Lago beginning 5 years ago and Paymenter 4 years ago.
Paymenter uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Lago's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management, Payment Infrastructure.
Both Lago and Paymenter offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.