Learn how Lago and UniBee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.57.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getlago/lago
Last 30 days

Lago appears to have several advantages over UniBee, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Lago significantly outpaces UniBee in community adoption with 10,776 stars compared to 235 stars on GitHub. This 45.9x difference suggests Lago has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Lago has 785 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Lago and UniBee are moving at much the same rate, adding 112 stars and adding 3 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Lago shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while UniBee was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Lago is being more actively maintained.
Lago has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to UniBee which began 3 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Lago may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lago also focuses on Payment Infrastructure.
Both Lago and UniBee offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.