Learn how Lago and UniBee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Lago appears to have several advantages over UniBee, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Lago significantly outpaces UniBee in community adoption with 10,369 stars compared to 229 stars on GitHub. This 45.3x difference suggests Lago has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Lago has 722 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
UniBee is growing faster, adding 28 stars in the last 30 days (+14%) against adding 131 stars for Lago (+1.3%). UniBee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Lago shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while UniBee was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Lago is being more actively maintained.
Lago has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to UniBee which began 2 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Lago may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lago also focuses on Payment Infrastructure.
Both Lago and UniBee offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.