Learn how Hyperswitch and Lago differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Hyperswitch and Lago have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hyperswitch significantly outpaces Lago in community adoption with 42,574 stars compared to 9,607 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests Hyperswitch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hyperswitch has 4,609 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyperswitch last updated 19 hours ago and Lago 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyperswitch uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Rust while Lago leverages Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyperswitch beginning 4 years ago and Lago 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Hyperswitch is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Lago uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hyperswitch also focuses on Fintech Infrastructure while Lago extends into Subscription & Billing Management.
Lago provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hyperswitch may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.