Learn how Formance and Hyperswitch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.

Both Formance and Hyperswitch have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hyperswitch significantly outpaces Formance in community adoption with 43,445 stars compared to 517 stars on GitHub. This 84.0x difference suggests Hyperswitch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hyperswitch has 5,037 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Formance and Hyperswitch are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 250 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Formance last updated 5 days ago and Hyperswitch 56 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formance uses Golang while Hyperswitch leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Formance beginning 4 years ago and Hyperswitch 4 years ago.
Formance uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hyperswitch's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure, Fintech Infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository