Learn how Formance and Hyperswitch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Hyperswitch appears to have several advantages over Formance, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hyperswitch significantly outpaces Formance in community adoption with 42,574 stars compared to 507 stars on GitHub. This 84.0x difference suggests Hyperswitch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hyperswitch has 4,609 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hyperswitch shows more recent development activity with its last commit 19 hours ago, while Formance was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Hyperswitch is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formance uses Golang while Hyperswitch leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Formance beginning 4 years ago and Hyperswitch 4 years ago.
Hyperswitch is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Formance's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure, Fintech Infrastructure.