Learn how Formance and Hyperswitch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v3.2.11License
MITRepository
formancehq/stack
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.128.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
juspay/hyperswitch
Both Formance and Hyperswitch have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hyperswitch significantly outpaces Formance in community adoption with 45,583 stars compared to 530 stars on GitHub. This 86.0x difference suggests Hyperswitch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hyperswitch has 6,570 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Formance and Hyperswitch are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 315 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Formance last updated 2 days ago and Hyperswitch 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formance uses Golang while Hyperswitch leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Formance beginning 4 years ago and Hyperswitch 4 years ago.
Formance uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hyperswitch's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure, Fintech Infrastructure.