Learn how Formance and Hyperswitch differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these payment infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Formance and Hyperswitch have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hyperswitch significantly outpaces Formance in community adoption with 43,568 stars compared to 521 stars on GitHub. This 83.6x difference suggests Hyperswitch has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hyperswitch has 5,106 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Formance is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 188 stars for Hyperswitch (+0.4%). Formance is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Formance last updated 3 days ago and Hyperswitch 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formance uses Golang while Hyperswitch leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Formance beginning 4 years ago and Hyperswitch 4 years ago.
Formance uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hyperswitch's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Payment Infrastructure, Fintech Infrastructure.