Learn how Autumn and UniBee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Autumn and UniBee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Autumn significantly outpaces UniBee in community adoption with 2,647 stars compared to 229 stars on GitHub. This 11.6x difference suggests Autumn has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Autumn has 242 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
UniBee is growing faster, adding 28 stars in the last 30 days (+14%) against adding 28 stars for Autumn (+1.1%). UniBee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Autumn shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while UniBee was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests Autumn is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Autumn beginning 2 years ago and UniBee 2 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Autumn is licensed under Apache-2.0 while UniBee uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management.
UniBee provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Autumn may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.