Learn how Autumn and UniBee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these subscription & billing management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
useautumn/autumn
Last 30 days

Both Autumn and UniBee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Autumn significantly outpaces UniBee in community adoption with 2,832 stars compared to 235 stars on GitHub. This 12.1x difference suggests Autumn has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Autumn has 279 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
UniBee is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 27 stars for Autumn (+1%). UniBee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Autumn shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 days ago, while UniBee was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Autumn is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Autumn beginning 2 years ago and UniBee 3 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Autumn is licensed under Apache-2.0 while UniBee uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Subscription & Billing Management.
UniBee provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Autumn may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.